Hypancistrus
Strolling the yard
I am a little digusted with the reptile site I frequent at the moment.
I responded to a thread a few days back in which a person new to the hobby, living in NY City said that they had to evacuate their apartment building due to a kitchen fire in another unit. They grabbed their dog and cat and a few snakes but couldn't take the anoles, so they just opened the cages and let them go free in hopes they could escape. Turns out it was a false alarm and they were only outside for 30 minutes. When they got back all three lizards were gone. They found one the next morning but haven't found the other two.
I made what I though was a very gentle comment that said "Sorry to hear this happened to you, it sounds like a bad situation all around. But I don't think it was wise to release your lizards, especially with the bad publicity that captive reptile releases have been getting in the news lately. I know you are new to the reptile hobby and you seem really enthusiastic- take a look at some of the problems being caused by released non-native animals."
I am now being blasted for being insensitive and accused of not loving my animals enough because I would NOT under any circumstances just set them free to "save" them.
I am completely and utterly baffled by this.
I know it's just three anoles and the New York winter will likely kill them, but does that justify it? Is it better for an animal to starve and freeze to death slowly when it is released, or to die in a fire (or in this case, to NOT die in a fire)? Neither one is good... but what is the lesser of two evils? What of your responsibilities to not just your animal, but to the hobby as a whole and to your neighbors? One person even said that the dog kennel they worked at has a policy that any animals that cannot be safely removed on leashes in an emergency should be turned loose.
All I can think about when I read that is how I would feel if my beautiful Golden boy, Riley, was turned loose on the streets of Baltimore to be burned by punks in the park, hit by a car on a city street or worse yet... picked up by a gang and used to bait pit bulls with his mouth taped shut. Even writing it gives me nightmares. Either way it's a bad thing... but I'd truly rather know that Riley died in a fire, and grieve his loss, than to have him missing and not know where he is or what is happening to him.
Does this make me a bad person? I am looking at him now and I really don't think it does. I look at my snakes and know that if I had to make that choice, it would be part of the responsibilities of being a snake keeper... allowing an animal to go loose on purpose is just NOT the responsible thing to do......
I responded to a thread a few days back in which a person new to the hobby, living in NY City said that they had to evacuate their apartment building due to a kitchen fire in another unit. They grabbed their dog and cat and a few snakes but couldn't take the anoles, so they just opened the cages and let them go free in hopes they could escape. Turns out it was a false alarm and they were only outside for 30 minutes. When they got back all three lizards were gone. They found one the next morning but haven't found the other two.
I made what I though was a very gentle comment that said "Sorry to hear this happened to you, it sounds like a bad situation all around. But I don't think it was wise to release your lizards, especially with the bad publicity that captive reptile releases have been getting in the news lately. I know you are new to the reptile hobby and you seem really enthusiastic- take a look at some of the problems being caused by released non-native animals."
I am now being blasted for being insensitive and accused of not loving my animals enough because I would NOT under any circumstances just set them free to "save" them.
I am completely and utterly baffled by this.
I know it's just three anoles and the New York winter will likely kill them, but does that justify it? Is it better for an animal to starve and freeze to death slowly when it is released, or to die in a fire (or in this case, to NOT die in a fire)? Neither one is good... but what is the lesser of two evils? What of your responsibilities to not just your animal, but to the hobby as a whole and to your neighbors? One person even said that the dog kennel they worked at has a policy that any animals that cannot be safely removed on leashes in an emergency should be turned loose.
All I can think about when I read that is how I would feel if my beautiful Golden boy, Riley, was turned loose on the streets of Baltimore to be burned by punks in the park, hit by a car on a city street or worse yet... picked up by a gang and used to bait pit bulls with his mouth taped shut. Even writing it gives me nightmares. Either way it's a bad thing... but I'd truly rather know that Riley died in a fire, and grieve his loss, than to have him missing and not know where he is or what is happening to him.
Does this make me a bad person? I am looking at him now and I really don't think it does. I look at my snakes and know that if I had to make that choice, it would be part of the responsibilities of being a snake keeper... allowing an animal to go loose on purpose is just NOT the responsible thing to do......