AMBunny
Moving in
- Joined
- 4/4/20
- Messages
- 14
- Real Name
- Dawn
So, I have a decent understanding of dominant vs recessive and sex-linked, co-dominant etc.
I don't know the parentage/genetics of my pair, they were inhereted. I have been given different opinions as to tyoe of Blue (male), and have been told the female (Amari) is the Pallid (or australian cinnamon)
I will attach pictures with and without flash.
I was told their offspring will ALWAYS be green series, someone even suggested they will always just be visual green and split to blue.
My question is this...Why wouldn't male offspring to be visual to Pallid?
(M)Blue = BB (XX)
(F)Amari = P? (XY)
Offspring would be BP (males) and B? (females)
The 2 babies they have had are green, in my mind that would mean that the ? is a G and therefore are BG (females)
Why wouldn't the Males that are BP be visible Pallids?
I don't know the parentage/genetics of my pair, they were inhereted. I have been given different opinions as to tyoe of Blue (male), and have been told the female (Amari) is the Pallid (or australian cinnamon)
I will attach pictures with and without flash.
I was told their offspring will ALWAYS be green series, someone even suggested they will always just be visual green and split to blue.
My question is this...Why wouldn't male offspring to be visual to Pallid?
(M)Blue = BB (XX)
(F)Amari = P? (XY)
Offspring would be BP (males) and B? (females)
The 2 babies they have had are green, in my mind that would mean that the ? is a G and therefore are BG (females)
Why wouldn't the Males that are BP be visible Pallids?
Attachments
-
155.6 KB Views: 4
-
108.1 KB Views: 5
-
93.5 KB Views: 4
-
93.5 KB Views: 4
-
118.5 KB Views: 5
-
96.2 KB Views: 5
-
118 KB Views: 3
Last edited: